If the complaint is the PSA, and it usually is, the cheapest answer is still HaloPSA alongside NinjaOne: it changes nothing on the endpoint side and keeps the highest RMM depth score in the ranking.
If you want one product instead of two, Syncro at $129 per technician publishes everything. If the per device bill is the problem, SuperOps starts at $1.50 where NinjaOne reaches $1.50 only at ten thousand endpoints. Datto RMM is the only like-for-like swap and publishes no price at all.
- PSA is the complaint: HaloPSA beside NinjaOne
- Want one product: Syncro, per technician, fully published
- Too expensive per device: SuperOps, from $1.50
- Same shape, different vendor: Datto RMM, price unpublished
- Outgrown it rather than unhappy with it: ConnectWise
We do not accept payment for placement. Scores come from a published 40-point rubric, applied to vendor pricing and product pages read at the source on September 10, 2026; vendors can dispute a fact but not a score. How we rank software · Affiliate disclosure
The rankingComparison table
| Tool | Best for | Pricing model | Starts at | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 HaloPSAOften the right answer | Buying the half NinjaOne is missing, and keeping the half it does well | Per agent | $85 to $99 / agent / mo | 8.8 |
 SyncroBest straight swap | Small MSPs replacing the platform rather than adding to it | Per technician | $129 / user / mo | 7.6 |
 SuperOps | Leaving on price while keeping per endpoint billing | Per technician, with an endpoint allowance | From $129 / technician | 7.5 |
 Datto RMM | The only like-for-like swap, if you want to stay RMM only | Quote only | Quote only | 6.4 |
 ConnectWise | Outgrowing NinjaOne rather than replacing it | Quote only | Quote only | 8.5 |
 Atera | One console and one vendor for a small team | Per technician | From $129 / technician | 7.1 |
Start with why you are leaving, because the four common reasons point at four different products and only one of them involves leaving.
| Why you are looking | Where it points |
|---|---|
| The PSA is the gap, so tickets and billing live elsewhere | HaloPSA, and keep NinjaOne |
| You want one product instead of two | Syncro, per technician, everything published |
| The per endpoint bill grows every time you win a client | Syncro or Atera, which bill per technician |
| It costs too much per device | SuperOps, from $1.50 in published bands |
| You want the same shape from a different vendor | Datto RMM, the only like-for-like |
| The business has outgrown it | ConnectWise, which is not a swap |
NinjaOne has very few actual substitutes
That is the finding, and it is inconvenient for a page with this title. NinjaOne is built around endpoint management, and it is the deepest endpoint management in the MSP ranking, at 9 out of 10 on RMM depth, the highest single criterion score on that page.
So most of the products listed as NinjaOne competitors are not substitutes at all for MSPs, and most things sold as NinjaOne alternatives are not either.
They are a different purchase: an all-in-one platform instead of a specialist, a per technician bill instead of a per device one, a bigger product for a bigger business. Exactly one entry below is a like-for-like swap, and it publishes no price.
Which makes the first row of the table above the one worth reading twice. If the complaint is the PSA, buying a PSA costs less, changes less and keeps the thing NinjaOne is best at. No vendor comparison page will tell you that, because no vendor sells it.
What NinjaOne sells today
One correction, dated September 23, 2026. NinjaOne’s own site now publishes a PSA at ninjaone.com/msp/psa, described there as all-in-one PSA software for MSPs covering contracts, billing, ticketing, documentation and IT asset management, with a separate billing and invoicing page under it.
The ranking below was built on desk research dated September 10, 2026, before that. So read the first row as a choice between two PSAs rather than as filling a hole. Buying HaloPSA alongside NinjaOne still moves no devices, which is why it stays first, but NinjaOne’s own PSA is now worth pricing first.
The rest of the line, from NinjaOne’s own platform menu: endpoint management, RMM, remote access, backup, autonomous patch management, vulnerability management, endpoint security, mobile device management, documentation, IT asset management and browser management. It monitors and manages Windows, Mac and Linux devices, servers, virtual machines and network devices.
NinjaOne describes the shape as one lightweight agent, one centralized console and a unified data model to manage, monitor and secure every device. That is what an alternative has to match. Not a features list, but one agent and one console across every platform your IT teams support.
Why the ranks and the scores disagree
The number beside each product is not this page’s judgment. It is the score that product already carries on the ranking it lives on, printed here so the two pages never quietly disagree about the same tool.
The rank is a different question: how well does this replace NinjaOne, for the reasons people actually leave.
So ConnectWise sits fifth here with the highest score on the page, at 8.5, because being the best MSP platform and being a sensible NinjaOne replacement are not the same thing. Datto RMM sits fourth with the lowest, at 6.4, and is the only true like-for-like on the list.
If the two orders agreed, one of them would be redundant.
MethodHow we picked
Every price and capability here was read at the vendor’s own pages on September 10, 2026 and is recorded in the evidence files behind the MSP and PSA rankings. Nothing on this page comes from a competitor’s comparison table, which in this category is a genre rather than a source: every vendor here publishes one about the others.
This page carries no rubric of its own and awards no scores of its own, deliberately. A product scored twice by the same site is a site arguing with itself.
NinjaOne vs Atera
NinjaOne vs Atera is the head to head MSPs run most often, and the two are opposite shapes. NinjaOne bills per device on a tiered rate. Atera bills per technician with unlimited devices, so the bill moves with headcount rather than with the fleet.
Your own ratio decides it. An MSP whose device count grows faster than its technician count is punished by per device billing and rewarded by per technician billing. Many technicians looking after few devices is the other way round. Count both numbers before reading either price list.
On depth, NinjaOne takes 9 out of 10 for RMM against Atera at 7 in the MSP ranking. Atera does publish a complete per technician price list: it renders in the browser rather than in the served page, and it is printed on the Atera pricing page.
Products you will see on other NinjaOne alternatives lists
The vendor comparison pages for this keyword run to fifteen or twenty entries. Most are not on this page because they answer a narrower question than NinjaOne does, and it is worth knowing which is which before shortlisting from somebody else’s list. Each description below is the vendor’s own.
- Action1. Autonomous patch management and vulnerability remediation for Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints, by its own description. That is one part of what NinjaOne does. Pricing at Action1 pricing.
- PDQ Connect. PDQ calls it a cloud based endpoint and patch management product for Windows and macOS devices. Same narrowing. Pricing at PDQ Connect pricing.
- Automox. Patching first, by its own description: cover every endpoint, patched or not, and prove it. A security and compliance purchase rather than an RMM one.
- ManageEngine Endpoint Central. ManageEngine calls it a unified endpoint management and security solution for servers, desktops, laptops and mobile devices. Closer to a substitute, and priced by edition at Endpoint Central pricing.
- Kaseya VSA. Kaseya names VSA and Datto RMM as its two remote monitoring and management tools, so VSA is a second like-for-like from the same vendor as the one already ranked here.
- Pulseway. Its own site calls it complete remote monitoring and management software, with automation, patching, remote control and network discovery.
- N-able N-sight. N-able describes unified endpoint management with RMM tools, ticketing and billing in one platform, which makes it a bundled platform rather than a specialist.
- Microsoft Intune. Covered separately here, because what is priced and what is not is a licensing question before it is a product comparison. See Intune pricing.
None of these changes the ranking above, which weighs the six options that answer the reasons MSPs actually give for leaving. They are listed so a shortlist built from somebody else’s page can be read against the same test.
Internal IT teams and MSPs do not get the same answer
NinjaOne sells to both, and the six options above lean toward MSPs, because contracts and client billing are what an MSP needs from a second product. Internal IT teams bill nobody, so the first row of the table matters much less to them and the checklist below matters much more.
For in house teams the live questions are device coverage, patching, remote support and endpoint security, plus whatever the security team already owns. The MSP specific features, contracts, agreements and client billing, are cost without benefit. Weigh the platform on the seven points below instead.
What to check in a NinjaOne alternative
Seven things, checked against your own estate rather than against a vendor features list. Counting features tells IT teams very little. These seven decide whether the platform survives contact with your devices.
- Device coverage. Windows, macOS, Linux, servers, virtual machines and mobile device management, against the devices you actually run.
- Monitoring and alerting. What raises an alert out of the box, and how much tuning it takes before technicians stop ignoring it.
- Patch management. Third party applications as well as the operating system, and whether patch rings are policy driven.
- Remote access. Whether remote control and remote support are included, and whether unattended access sits in the base price.
- Automation. How much of your script library has to be rewritten, because a library built against one RMM is written for that one.
- Endpoint security and backup. Whether they are modules on the same platform or separate vendors, and what that does to the total bill.
- Support and onboarding. Whether implementation, training and support are charged, what the support response commitment is, and how long the platform takes to stand up.
Work the list against the products above, not against a comparison page. Every vendor here publishes one about the others, and a features table written by a competitor is an argument with a table around it.
The comparison nobody prices: what leaving costs
Every row except the first involves moving every endpoint you manage, and that cost does not appear in any quote.
Budget for the agent swap in weeks rather than days, and for rebuilding automation, policies, patch rings and reporting to take considerably longer than the swap itself.
Both platforms run at once for at least one billing cycle, because the old one stays until the last endpoint has moved. And the scripts do not port: a library built against one RMM is written for that one.
Which is the strongest argument for the first row on this page. Adding a PSA alongside NinjaOne has an endpoint migration cost of zero.
HaloPSA
Put this first because it is the answer to the most common reason people search for NinjaOne competitors, and no competitor page will ever suggest it: you may not need to replace NinjaOne at all.
The usual complaint is not the endpoint management. NinjaOne takes 9 out of 10 on RMM depth in the ranking, the highest single score on that page. The complaint is that there is no PSA, so tickets, contracts and invoices live somewhere else.
Replacing the whole platform to solve that means giving up the best endpoint tool in the category to fix a problem in the other half.
Buying the other half instead costs $99 per agent per month for a small team, falling with volume, with every module included, and the endpoint side does not move: no agent rollout, no policy rebuild, no reporting to reconstruct.
HaloPSA is one of only three PSAs that publishes a price at all, and it is the one that scores highest on the PSA ranking.
The honest cost is that you are running two products with an integration between them, which is a real operational load and the reason all-in-one platforms exist. Weigh that against migrating every endpoint you manage.
Where it wins
- Solves the actual complaint without touching the endpoint side at all
- Keeps the highest RMM depth score in the ranking rather than trading it away
- Publishes its price, which two of the three PSAs here do not
- Every module included in one per agent price, with no feature tiers
Where it loses
- You end up with two products and an integration you own forever
- Two invoices and two vendors instead of one
- Onboarding is a required purchase at a cost Halo does not publish
- Does nothing about the per endpoint billing if that is why you are leaving
How HaloPSA scores, criterion by criterion
HaloPSA pricing, verified September 10, 2026
| What you buy | Price | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| HaloPSA, per agent | $99 / agent / mo | Billed annually | 5 to 24 agents, US; falls with volume |
| NinjaOne, kept | $1.50 to $3.75 / endpoint | Unchanged | No migration on this side |
| Endpoint migration cost | None | None | Which is the point of this row |
| What you take on | One integration | Ongoing | The real price of not switching |
Syncro
If you do want one product instead of two, this is the closest practical landing place for a NinjaOne shop, and it answers two of the four reasons people leave at once.
It has the PSA. Ticketing, billing and invoicing are in the same product and the same database as the RMM, so there is no integration to maintain.
It changes the billing unit. NinjaOne bills per endpoint, so every client device you win increases the invoice. Syncro bills per technician at $129 per user per month on the annual Core plan, with unlimited endpoints.
Land forty new workstations on a Tuesday and nothing changes. That reverses on the day you hire: a fourth technician adds $1,548 a year before they bill an hour.
And it publishes everything, in annual and monthly form, against a NinjaOne page that publishes the two ends of a range and nothing between them. For a small provider trying to model a budget, that difference is not academic.
What you give up is endpoint depth. Syncro takes 7 out of 10 on RMM depth against NinjaOne at 9, and that gap is the whole trade.
Where it wins
- RMM and PSA in one product, which removes the reason most people are looking
- Per technician billing, so winning clients stops increasing the bill
- The complete price list is published, in annual and monthly form
- 14 day trial with no credit card, 24/5 live support and SOC 2 Type II, all published
Where it loses
- RMM depth of 7 against NinjaOne at 9, which is what you are trading away
- Every technician you hire adds $1,548 a year at the Core rate
- Least published evidence at the sizes ConnectWise documents
- A full endpoint migration: agents, policies, automation and reporting
How Syncro scores, criterion by criterion
Syncro pricing, verified September 10, 2026
| What you buy | Price | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core, annual | $129 per user / mo | $1,548 per user | RMM and PSA, unlimited endpoints |
| Team, annual | $179 per user / mo | $2,148 per user | Adds Microsoft 365 security and identity |
| Against NinjaOne | Different unit | Not comparable | Per technician against per endpoint |
| Trial | Free | 14 days | No credit card required |
SuperOps
The comparison that does the most damage to NinjaOne on price, and it is worth stating carefully because it is not the whole story.
On its list for internal IT, SuperOps starts at $1.50 per endpoint per month in published bands falling to $1.20 above a thousand devices. NinjaOne reaches $1.50 only at ten thousand endpoints, and its published rate at fifty or fewer is $3.75.
So at the small and middle sizes where most providers actually operate, SuperOps is materially cheaper per device and includes a PSA that NinjaOne does not have at any price.
The caveats are real. There is a hundred endpoint minimum, so the smallest shops pay for capacity they do not use. And the trade is the same one Syncro asks for: 7 out of 10 on RMM depth against NinjaOne at 9.
It suits a provider whose complaint is the bill rather than the missing PSA, and who wants to stay in the per endpoint world rather than re-plan around technician headcount.
Where it wins
- Published bands from $1.50, where NinjaOne reaches $1.50 only at ten thousand endpoints
- Includes a PSA, which NinjaOne does not have at any price
- Stays in the per endpoint unit, so the budgeting model does not change
- Unlimited technicians on every plan
Where it loses
- A hundred endpoint minimum, which is a floor NinjaOne does not impose
- RMM depth of 7 against NinjaOne at 9
- The youngest platform here, with the least published evidence at size
- Contract and billing depth behind the incumbents if the PSA is why you moved
How SuperOps scores, criterion by criterion
SuperOps pricing, verified September 10, 2026
| What you buy | Price | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro, annual | $129 per technician / mo | $1,548 per technician / yr | 150 endpoints included per license |
| Super Plus | $3.00 per endpoint / mo | Tiered to $2.00 | The per endpoint plan, if that unit suits better |
| NinjaOne at 50 or fewer | $3.75 per endpoint / mo | Published | The comparison at the small end |
| NinjaOne at 10,000 | $1.50 per endpoint / mo | Published | Where the two rates finally meet |
Datto RMM
This is the only genuine like-for-like on the page. Both are endpoint management without a PSA of their own, both bill per device, and swapping one for the other changes the tool without changing the shape of the business.
Which is exactly why it is fourth rather than first. If the shape is what you want to keep, the question becomes what you gain, and the answer is thin unless you are already inside the Kaseya family.
There the argument is real: Kaseya owns Datto RMM and Autotask, asset data flows from the endpoint tool into the service desk rather than being retyped, and if the backup is Datto too then one vendor covers three problems.
Against that, you are trading a published price range for no price at all, and RMM depth of 7.5 against NinjaOne at 9. NinjaOne also offers a 14 day trial where the Datto RMM product page offers none.
Leaving NinjaOne for Datto RMM without the rest of the Kaseya stack is a swap with very little on the other side of it.
Where it wins
- The only true like-for-like: RMM only, per endpoint, same shape of purchase
- Asset data flows into Autotask rather than being retyped, if you run it
- One vendor across endpoints, service desk and often backup
- Ransomware detection with automatic client alerting as a named capability
Where it loses
- No published price at all, where NinjaOne at least publishes both ends of a range
- No free trial on the product page
- RMM depth of 7.5 against NinjaOne at 9
- Its whole argument assumes you are buying the rest of the Kaseya stack
How Datto RMM scores, criterion by criterion
Datto RMM pricing, verified September 10, 2026
| What you buy | Price | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Any configuration | Quote only | Quote only | Nothing published on the product page |
| NinjaOne, for comparison | $1.50 to $3.75 | Published range | Both ends, at least |
| Autotask PSA | Separate product | Quote | The other half, same owner |
| Trial | Not offered | n/a | NinjaOne offers 14 days |
ConnectWise
Fifth on this page and first on the ranking, which is the clearest illustration of why the two orders are different questions.
ConnectWise is not a NinjaOne replacement. It is what you move to when the business has outgrown the shape NinjaOne fits: past a few thousand endpoints, with procurement and a sales pipeline running through the same system, and with a hiring problem you would rather solve by buying coverage.
That last one is the genuinely unique part, because ConnectWise sells NOC, help desk and dedicated technician teams alongside the software and nothing else in this category does at the same scale.
Moving there from NinjaOne is a project rather than a migration, and the price is a negotiation with no published figure to anchor it, against a product that at least tells you the ends of its range.
If the reason you are reading this page is that NinjaOne costs too much or lacks a PSA, this is the wrong row. If the reason is that the business has changed shape, it is probably the right one.
Where it wins
- Both halves at depth as its own products, and the highest score in the MSP ranking
- Sells NOC, help desk and dedicated technicians, which nothing else here offers at scale
- Procurement and sales opportunity management in the same system as service and billing
- Documented at sizes the rest of this list does not reach
Where it loses
- Not a replacement: a different size of business, and a project rather than a migration
- No published price of any kind, against a NinjaOne range you can at least read
- Two products, two consoles and the integration between them
- The heaviest thing here to stand up, and the least suited to a small shop
How ConnectWise scores, criterion by criterion
ConnectWise pricing, verified September 10, 2026
| What you buy | Price | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Any configuration | Quote only | Quote only | The pricing page is a form |
| ScreenConnect | $30 to $55 / mo | Published | The one ConnectWise product with a price |
| NOC and help desk | Quote | Quote | Labor, sold alongside the software |
| NinjaOne, for comparison | $1.50 to $3.75 | Published range | A number you can plan against |
Atera
NinjaOne against Atera is the comparison people search for by name, so here it is directly.
They are opposite shapes. NinjaOne is endpoint management only, billed per device, with the deepest RMM in the ranking at 9 out of 10.
Atera puts RMM, ticketing, patching and remote access in one product on one database, bills per technician with the endpoint count left open, and scores 7 on RMM depth. If your endpoint count is growing faster than your team, Atera stops the bill growing. If the reverse, it does not.
The pricing comparison cannot be completed, and that is worth saying rather than guessing. Atera states on its own page that it prices per technician, and the plan figures render in the browser rather than in the served page, so they could not be read on September 10, 2026.
Two add-ons are published as concepts rather than numbers: Network Discovery is charged per technician per month, and Work from Home per end user per month, which is a third billing unit on one invoice.
Choose it for one console and one vendor at small scale. Do not choose it expecting NinjaOne’s endpoint depth, and do not assume the per technician model is cheaper until you have counted both numbers.
Where it wins
- RMM and ticketing on one database, so there is no integration between halves
- Per technician billing with the endpoint count left open
- The most developed AI layer among the bundled platforms
- One vendor, one console and one invoice for a small team
Where it loses
- Two published price lists for one platform, and the one aimed at IT departments is dearer at every tier
- RMM depth of 7 against NinjaOne at 9
- Network Discovery and Work from Home are add-ons, on two further billing units
- Least evidence here of behavior at several thousand endpoints
How Atera scores, criterion by criterion
Atera pricing, verified September 10, 2026
| What you buy | Price | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro, annual | $129 per technician / mo | $1,548 per technician | Unlimited endpoints on every tier |
| Growth, annual | $159 per technician / mo | $1,908 per technician | Marked most popular |
| Power, annual | $209 per technician / mo | $2,508 per technician | Compliance and custom reports |
| Endpoints | Unlimited | Included | The unit is the technician |
| Network Discovery | Add-on, per technician / mo | Extra | The network half is not in the base plan |
| NinjaOne, for comparison | $1.50 to $3.75 / endpoint | Published range | The opposite unit |
FitWho this ranking is for, and who should skip it
Three cases where the answer is to stay.
You already have a PSA you are happy with. Then NinjaOne is doing exactly the job MSPs buy it for, and it is the best in the ranking at that job. Nothing on this page improves on it without asking you to buy a second thing you already own.
You are near the top of the volume curve. NinjaOne publishes $1.50 per endpoint at ten thousand devices, with implementation, training and support all stated as not charged and no license cap. At that size the price stops being the reason to leave, and the pricing page sets out what is and is not on that bill.
Your complaint is a contract rather than a product. Without a promotional commitment, NinjaOne states you can cancel on 60 days notice. If a discount converted that into a term, the problem is the term and a different vendor will offer the same trade.
And one case where the answer is clearly to move: an estate where the endpoint count keeps growing and the technician count does not. Per endpoint billing punishes exactly that shape, and the two per technician products on this page stop the bill moving.
One more thing worth pricing before any of this. NinjaOne now sells its own PSA, so the second product you are about to buy may already be available from the vendor you are already paying. That does not settle it, but it belongs in the comparison.
If you are choosing rather than leaving, the whole category is ranked at best MSP software, and the PSA half on its own at best PSA software.
ChangelogWhat changed in this update
- First published. Six options weighed against NinjaOne and ranked by fitness as a replacement, with each product carrying the score it already holds on its own ranking rather than a new one.
- Corrected the HaloPSA figures. The live pricing calculator prices per agent by volume, $99 a month for 5 to 24 agents in the United States falling to $85 from 100, and charges a concurrent seat at twice a named one. The previous figure, GBP 66 per agent with concurrent licenses at the same rate, came from a static block in the page source that the calculator replaces.
- Corrected the product scope. NinjaOne publishes an all-in-one PSA for MSPs on its own site, covering contracts, billing, ticketing, documentation and IT asset management, so the sentences saying it is endpoint management and nothing else, and that the PSA is missing, were wrong and have been reworded. The ranking, the picks and the scores are unchanged and still rest on desk research dated September 10, 2026.
FAQFrequently asked questions
Who are NinjaOne’s main competitors?
On endpoint management alone, Datto RMM is the only true like-for-like, because both are endpoint management products billed per device. In practice most buyers compare NinjaOne against all-in-one platforms that include a PSA: Syncro, SuperOps and Atera at small scale, ConnectWise at large. Those are different shapes of purchase rather than substitutes.
What is the best NinjaOne alternative?
It depends on why you are leaving, and for the most common reason the answer is not to leave. If the complaint is the PSA, buying HaloPSA alongside NinjaOne costs less and changes less than replacing the platform. If you want one product, Syncro. If the per device bill is the problem, SuperOps from $1.50 in published bands.
NinjaOne or Atera?
Opposite shapes. NinjaOne is endpoint first, billed per device, and the deepest RMM in the ranking at 9 out of 10. Atera bundles RMM and ticketing on one database, bills per technician with unlimited endpoints, and scores 7 on RMM depth.
Growing endpoints faster than headcount favors Atera; the reverse favors NinjaOne. Atera’s figures render in the browser rather than in the served page, and are printed on the Atera pricing page here.
Is there a cheaper alternative to NinjaOne?
On its list for internal IT, SuperOps publishes bands starting at $1.50 per endpoint per month, which is the rate NinjaOne reaches only at ten thousand endpoints, and it includes a PSA.
The caveats are a hundred endpoint minimum and RMM depth of 7 against NinjaOne at 9. At the top of the volume curve the two rates converge and price stops being the argument.
Can I keep NinjaOne and add a PSA?
Yes, and it is the first entry on this page for a reason. HaloPSA publishes $99 per agent per month for small teams with every module included, and the endpoint side does not move: no agent rollout, no policy rebuild, no reporting to reconstruct. The cost is running two products with an integration between them.
Why is ConnectWise ranked fifth here but first on the MSP ranking?
Because they answer different questions. The ranking asks which is the best MSP platform and ConnectWise wins it at 8.5.
This page asks how well something replaces NinjaOne, and ConnectWise is not a replacement: it is where a business moves when it has outgrown the shape NinjaOne fits. The scores on this page are the ones from the rankings, not new ones.
What does it cost to migrate away from NinjaOne?
Nothing you will find in a quote. Plan for the agent swap in weeks, for rebuilding automation, policies, patch rings and reporting to take longer than the swap, and for both platforms running at once for at least one billing cycle.
Scripts do not port between RMM products. That cost is why adding a PSA rather than replacing the platform is worth pricing first.
Does NinjaOne lock you into a contract?
The vendor states that partners who have not opted into a promotional commitment can cancel at any time on 60 days notice. The exception is the important half: accepting a discounted rate in exchange for a term commitment converts a cancellable arrangement into a contract, and every competitor here will offer the same trade.
Is Datto RMM a direct NinjaOne replacement?
It is the only one on this page, in the sense that both are endpoint management products and both bill per device.
Whether it is a good one depends on the Kaseya stack: if you also run Autotask and Datto backup, asset data flows between them and one vendor covers three problems. Without that, you are trading a published price range for nothing published and RMM depth of 7.5 against 9.
Where do these scores come from?
Each one is the score that product already holds on the ranking it lives on, five from the MSP ranking and HaloPSA from the PSA ranking, printed here rather than recalculated. Every subscore is shown beside it. This page adds no scores of its own, because a product scored twice by the same site is a site arguing with itself.
Does NinjaOne have a PSA?
Yes. NinjaOne publishes an all-in-one PSA for MSPs on its own site, covering contracts, billing, ticketing, documentation and IT asset management, with a separate billing and invoicing page under it. That is newer than the desk research behind the ranking here, so price it before buying a second vendor.
NinjaOne vs Atera: which one is cheaper?
It depends on your ratio of devices to technicians, because the two are priced on different units. NinjaOne bills per device on a tiered rate. Atera bills per technician with unlimited devices. A growing fleet with flat headcount favors Atera, and many technicians with few devices favors NinjaOne.
Does NinjaOne include remote access and patch management?
Its own platform menu lists remote access, autonomous patch management, vulnerability management, endpoint security, mobile device management, backup, documentation, IT asset management and browser management alongside the RMM. Most products sold as alternatives compete with one part of that list rather than all of it.
Keep comparingRelated rankings
- Best Patch Management Software, and What Each One Reaches Seven tools, one 40 point rubric, every subscore published. Check the Windows Autopatch you may already own, t...
- JumpCloud Alternatives: Directory, SSO or Devices? JumpCloud is three products sold as one, identity, access and device management, and every alternative ranked...
- Ivanti Alternatives, by Which Ivanti You Are Leaving Ivanti is LANDESK, HEAT, MobileIron and Pulse Secure under one name, sold across endpoint management, IT servi...
- Atera Alternatives, and Why There Is No Half to Keep Atera is one product on one database, which is why people choose it and why leaving is all or nothing. It is a...
- ConnectWise Competitors, and the Half You Can Leave ConnectWise tops its ranking at 8.5, so nobody leaves it because it cannot do the job. They leave over price o...
- Best PSA Software, and Why a Ticketing System Is Not One Seven platforms, one 40 point rubric, every subscore published. A ticketing system tracks work; a PSA turns tr...