Results for "rmm pricing"
15 results. Concepts first, then blog posts, rankings and providers.
Most lists of open source RMM tools mix genuinely open source projects with a source-available one, an abandoned fork, and monitoring tools that are not RMM at all. This reads each license and each pricing page at source...

Every IT company will patch your server. What makes one a managed service provider is that it is paid the same whether or not your server goes down, and that changes what it wants.

Outsourcing models are compared on rate, and the rate is the least informative thing about them. What separates the five is how much responsibility moves across with the work.

On Windows the agent can do almost anything once installed. On a Mac, Apple’s privacy controls decide what it can see and touch, and the switch for most of that sits in MDM. This is what a profile can grant, what it cann...

The monitoring half is what gets sold. The management half is what matters, because accepting commands means the agent runs code as SYSTEM on every endpoint it is installed on.

The RMM watches the machines and the PSA runs the business. One of those is a deployment that rebuilds, and the other is years of history that everything else references.

Intune vs RMM comparisons repeat two gaps that Microsoft’s current documentation contradicts: unattended access on Windows and a third-party app catalog. The difference the documentation confirms is that Intune works ins...

The inventory half is the easy half and most organizations already have it. The relationships are what make it a CMDB, and they exist to answer one question: if this fails, what stops working.

The model matters more than the price, because the model decides what happens in year three. Here are the four structures, the five questions worth asking, and when switching actually pays.

ConnectWise sells four things and prices one of them in public. Here is the whole published price list, the concurrent technician model behind it, and how to approach the quote for everything else.

Six platforms, one 40 point rubric, every subscore published. The decision is not which RMM demos best, it is where the PSA comes from and whether your bill grows when you win a client or when you hire one.

NinjaOne is the deepest endpoint management in its ranking, and its own site now publishes a PSA as well. So most of its competitors are not substitutes, they are a different purchase, and which one fits depends entirely...

Seven platforms, one 40 point rubric, every subscore published. A ticketing system tracks work; a PSA turns tracked time into an invoice against a contract, and that is the criterion worth eight of the forty points.

ConnectWise tops its ranking at 8.5, so nobody leaves it because it cannot do the job. They leave over price opacity, weight and size. And because it is two products, you can leave half of it.

Atera is one product on one database, which is why people choose it and why leaving is all or nothing. It is also the only product in these rankings that renders its prices in the browser instead of serving them in the p...
